Update – what’s happening over there and in the Isle of Man

EIS and VCT

In the UK the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement contained few surprises, the main exception being changes in the rules affecting Enterprise Investment Schemes (‘EIS’) and their collective investment variant, the Venture Capital Trust (‘VCT’).

EIS were introduced in 1994 and VCTs in 1995, both with the intention of encouraging investment in small companies by offering tax concessions. EIS invest in single companies which satisfy certain criteria and VCTs in portfolios of qualifying businesses. Up to £500,000 can be invested annually via EIS, and £200,000 via VCTs; and both schemes offer up-front income tax relief of 30%. In addition, EIS provide exemption from capital gains tax if held for at least three years, and VCTs for five years.

The first change announced in the Chancellor’s statement is that the investment limit for EIS is to be increased to £1 million p.a.. The second is that restrictions on the size of companies in which the schemes can invest are being relaxed to include companies with assets up to £15 million and up to 250 employees.

The major surprise in the Autumn statement is that a new ‘Seed EIS’ (‘SEIS’) is to be introduced to encourage investment in start-up businesses. A major accountancy firm described as “astonishing” the fact that SEIS will provide 50% income tax relief in the tax year 2012/13 on investments up to £100,000 even if investors’ own tax rate is lower than 50%. In addition, if the investment is made from gains made from the sale of other assets in the same tax year, these gains will be exempt from capital gains tax.

As a result, every £1 invested in SEIS will cost the investor only 50p. In fact, the total relief will amount to 78% if gains are reinvested and account is taken of the 28% saving in CGT.

However, the benefits of SEIS could be outweighed by the very high risk of investing in start-ups, and the difficulty in conducting due diligence suggests that it is unlikely that SEIS will be available as a retail product. Investment is likely to be confined to entrepreneurs’ friends and families.

Pensions and tax

It had been suggested that the UK Chancellor might withdraw some of the tax benefits of pension saving, notably the availability of tax-free cash (usually 25% of the value of the fund) and higher rate tax relief on contributions. In the event these fears proved unfounded, but they serve as a reminder to higher rate taxpayers to take advantage of the current concessions while they last.

There were, however, other developments on the pensions front.
The State pension age is to be increased from 66 to 67 from 2026, eight years sooner than originally planned. This may cause some people to consider working longer or saving more, but one benefit is that retirees who have not yet accrued their maximum benefit entitlement will have a chance to top-up their National Insurance contributions. We understand this will also apply in the Isle of Man.

In the UK firms with fewer than 50 employees which do not have a comparable staff pension scheme in place will be required to introduce NEST (the National Employment Savings Trust) and the operative date had been set at April 2014. However, recognising the financial burden that compulsory contributions will place on such firms, the Government has announced that the operative date is to be deferred until May 2015. Larger employers are already instructing financial advisers to provide staff briefings and advice.

We see IOM government giving consideration to NEST or similar at some point in the next few years as pressure continues to be applied to Manx budgets and people are expected to save more for their own retirements rather than falling back on the state.

On the tax front, the annual UK capital gains tax allowance has been frozen at its present level of £10,600 for 2012/13. Finally and as an aside, we see the IOM review on the taxation of investments being a way by which the tax office may be able to apply capital gains tax in all but name. Watch this space.


Junior ISAs

In the UK, Junior ISAs have been available since November 2011, when they replaced Child Trust Funds. Family and friends can contribute up to £3,600 a year into either cash or stock and shares accounts, and from April 2013 the annual investment limit will increase in line with the consumer price index.

Accounts can be established for any UK resident under the age of 18, but no withdrawals can be made before the child’s 18th birthday, except in the case of terminal illness or death. When the age of 18 is reached, the Junior ISA will be converted automatically into an adult ISA.

Any method of encouraging children and young people to save, and being introduced to the concept of credit being the last rather than first resort, is to be welcomed. The lack of such options being available locally is something we hope government will consider.

Deferring annuity purchase

The income available to purchasers of retirement annuities has fallen by around 20% over the past three years and now stands at historically low levels. Consequently, many retirees are asking whether it would make sense to delay annuity purchase until rates might improve

There is a good chance that the yield on gilt-edged securities, which are the main influence on annuity rates, will rise from current levels in the foreseeable future. It is also a given that annuity rates will rise with increasing age, as also will the likelihood of declining health qualifying the annuitant for the improved rates available from an enhanced or impaired life annuities.

However, it’s not a one-way bet. Every year’s deferral is a year’s annuity income lost. And with every passing year, the period between payments starting and the reaper coming to call gets shorter.

The answer is likely to be different for each individual, but a good way for investors with larger pension pots to hedge their bets would be to phase annuity purchases over a number of years.

January 2012

No responsibility can be accepted for the accuracy of the information in this newsletter and no action should be taken in reliance on it without advice. Please remember that past performance is not necessarily a guide to future returns.
The value of units and the income from them may fall, as well as rise. Investors may not get back the amount originally invested.

Global investment markets are not for the faint hearted at the moment.

It is likely more stable conditions will return in due course –when the politicians come back from holiday in September and face up to their issues. Of course volatility is affecting even the best quality holdings as prices are forced downwards by indiscriminate sellers who need liquidity. We’ve seen it happening before not so very long ago.

 

I like the following commentary by Alan McIntosh, Cheviot CIO, on the latest market conditions. 

“Market update – reading the mood music

 

The recent rally in markets evaporated yesterday on further disappointing economic data. The US Philly Fed survey, which measures business conditions, fell to its lowest in two years, when the US was last in recession. Bear in mind, however, that this survey was conducted while the US was suffering the paralysis of negotiations over the debt ceiling and may be unduly pessimistic. Nevertheless, if the US does go back into recession later this year or early next, much of the blame rests firmly with the ineptitude of the politicians. In Europe, things are not much better. The Merkel / Sarkozy meeting gave us precisely nothing other than the prospect of a financial transactions tax. As they return to the beach, the ECB is left on its own to put out the fires in euro land. Banks were particularly hard hit yesterday. They are seen as a proxy for the woes of sovereigns. Markets are registering the seeming inability of the authorities to grasp the issues facing their economies.

 

Stockmarkets, if not pricing in outright recession in the US and Europe, are certainly factoring in much slower economic growth next year (and therefore lower corporate profits). Gilts and US treasuries continue to see lower yields, with investors willing to accept substantially negative real yields for “safety”. One can’t help but feel, however, that this will end in tears, since the finances of the UK and US are hardly solid.

 

Defensive shares are holding up comparatively well, offering solid cash flows and dependable yields. The trailing yield on the All-share index is now 65% higher than that of a 10-year gilt. On any sensible assessment of value, that is surely wrong. Nevertheless, investors are extremely risk averse at present and you would be forgiven for thinking that the mood music was closer to Mozart’s Requiem than Beethoven’s Ode to Joy.”

 

Last week banking shares suffered the steepest losses on the FTSE 100, on mounting concerns over the eurozone’s debt crisis. Resources stocks also dominated the loser board, amid fears that weak global growth will sap demand. Meanwhile, the yield, or implied interest rate, on benchmark US 10-year treasury notes fell 12 basis points to 2.05%, after touching a record low of 1.98% in an investor flight to safety. Similarly, gold prices jumped 1.7% to $1,819 an ounce, after hitting yet another record high at $1,826.

‘The gold market is telling us that we are potentially heading towards a second and perhaps more damaging economic crisis,’ warned Ross Norman of bullion brokers Sharps Pixley.

You could be forgiven for thinking ‘lets buy gold’, but…. buy gold at its highest point in years? This is very much like all those people who purchased property at the height of the boom or all those people who got on the dot.com bandwagon at its high point. I can’t say for certain you’re wrong but buying an asset as it screams towards a ‘peak’ should be considered with extreme caution. If anything, if you already hold gold, consider taking some profits.

Surely it makes more sense to look out for those so many now undervalued companies that were cheap before and are now at below bargain basement levels. FTSE 100 is at a one year low and it seems more right to buy shares now – that is if you are in it for the long term.

If the Euro fails maybe gold was a good idea, but if, as seems more likely, we bump along the bottom for a while and the Euro survives, then buying and holding gold could cost you dear. Companies as a whole are very profitable; it’s just the lack of clarity going forward that ’causes young men to panic’ as one IFA posted recently on Citywire.

The moral; have enough money to do with in life what you want to do (for the short to medium term). For the rest; have a diversified, risk-rated, managed and monitored portfolio – and pick a team you know to be qualified, licensed and above all that you trust to provide that service for you.

We understand that MNA Fraser Simpson (International) Limited has recently written to its clients around the world to advise that they are closing to new business on 30.06.2011 and are taking steps to surrender their Isle of Man investment license. Upon receiving this news one of their clients contacted us to request we take over as their offshore independent financial adviser. The IOMFSC website does not yet confirm this news and they were unable to comment when we rang them today (06.07.2011).

Thornton Associates Ltd are the first firm of Chartered Financial Planners in the Isle of Man with years of experience in looking after and advising British Expatriate clients from an offshore base.

If you are a client of MNAFS and require a relationship with a strong, well established and quality firm of  licensed Independent Financial Advisers (IFA’s) with a demonstrable commitment to providing a reliable and ongoing service from a well regulated base such as the Isle of Man, we would be pleased to assist with your financial planning, now and in the future.

To find out more about Thornton Associates Ltd (TAL)  and how we work visit our website on www.thorntonfs.com

Inheritance Tax in the Isle of Man? What next? I thought that would get your attention. Being asked to write an article about such a riveting subject as inheritance tax (IHT), when most people in the Isle of Man believe it has nothing to do with them, is a challenge. This is even more true if you consider that more than half of our population do not even have a Will with the most common justification being ‘I haven’t got around to it yet’.

Both these matters are beyond most people’s time horizon and put as far out of their minds as possible since none of us like the idea of dying – at all. Unfortunately at some time we all have to face the idea that no-one gets out alive.

 Isle of Man residency has the advantage of excellent tax rates and for the most part that includes no IHT. However, there are traps to be aware of, but with the correct professional advice, these can be planned for and possibly even avoided.

UK ‘Situs’ Assets. It is quite usual for people living permanently in the Isle of Man to hold UK assets, particularly property and investments. If these assets are in your personal name and valued at over £10,000, your executors (or estate administrators if you haven’t made a Will) are going to need to obtain a UK grant of Probate/Letters of Administration to distribute the assets. IHT can arise even if you are born and bred in the Isle of Man if your UK assets are over the current IHT threshold. Therefore without the correct planning your estate is liable to get an IHT bill to pay before the assets are released. With proper advice the IHT exposure mentioned above can be completely avoided.

 The various options available usually include the use of an Isle of Man company or an offshore Life Assurance Bond. The former option means ownership of the asset is transferred to the company: this means the individual then owns shares in an Isle of Man company rather than a UK asset. The method of transfer of the asset from the individual to company merits careful consideration to avoid unnecessary tax liabilities: in some cases the use of a trust may also be contemplated. Not only can correct tax planning ensure that IHT is avoided it can also avoid the necessity for UK probate.

A really important note is that where UK equities, for example, are held by a stockbroker/investment manager in their nominee name, they may not be protected from taxation. Use of the broker’s nominee name does not avoid exposure to IHT and anybody who is holding UK assets under the misapprehension that the nominee name will protect them from IHT should obtain professional tax advice immediately.

The Deemed Domicile Rule. An issue which we come across on a regular basis is where an individual has moved from the UK to the Isle of Man within the last three tax years. Even though this person or family has made the Isle of Man their permanent home and intends to stay here, their estate and any gifts they make are still within the scope of IHT for at least that period. Beyond this IHT can still be an issue; for example if the individual is seriously ill and has to attend the UK for treatment, or has to go to the UK to care for elderly and sick relatives. You may need to consider planning carefully to ensure potential IHT liabilities are mitigated or avoided altogether.

Isle of Man Domicile? Someone living in the Isle of Man having made the Island their permanent home or perhaps was born in the Isle of Man but is currently living elsewhere on a temporary basis may be in the advantageous position of having an Isle of Man domicile. The big advantage of Isle of Man domicile is that their estate, for the most part will not be subject to any Isle of Man estate taxation. But, if the individual holds UK assets, for example, UK property, a portfolio of UK investments or a beneficial interest in a trust with UK assets then IHT may apply. This is because any UK assets held by a non-UK domiciled individual are potentially exposed to IHT rates at 40%. This exposure can be relevant in two circumstances: firstly, if any of these UK assets are gifted, perhaps to an individual or a trust and secondly if the individual dies holding UK assets. We often find that people delay getting proper financial, taxation and Will planning advice due to a lack of understanding of their current and future financial positions.

What can you do? By spending some time with a Financial Planner with an up to date knowledge of both the UK and IOM tax regimes, it is possible to then meet with an advocate and/or tax adviser fully armed with a statement of of assets and liabilities, along with a better understanding of your estate planning wishes which I’m sure do not include gifting assets to HMRC in the form of 40% tax!

Sources; Chartered Insurance Institute AF1 syllabus, PKF (IOM) LLC

We pride ourselves as being members of a caring society and many of us are now turning our thoughts as to how best to fund care for close family members in old age.

The majority of us are keen to put off such thoughts however it becomes even more of a challenge when the day is upon us and we have not thought about the expense involved. Many elderly people face selling their house because they don’t have the money to get the care they need.  This article talks about how you begin to think about such an expense and the options available to you.

At Thornton Associates we often work closely with individuals to help them to manage and protect their wealth in later life and a study by Sun Life Financial of Canada’s Sense Check at 60 study suggest that very few people (around 1 in 4) are putting these plans in place for later life. This study looked at people with between £100,000 and £500,000 in pensions and savings; the sort of people we typically work with here at Thornton Associates.

Whilst we can make a big difference to the financial position of elderly clients by assisting with proper budgeting and clear succession planning, the biggest impact a financial planner can make to their client is earlier in life, with proper planning for later life and the peace of mind that can bring.

This is against a backdrop of a more complex environment for retirement planning with increased regulation, innumerable changes in legislation, to say nothing of rising inflation (6% IOM RPI as we go to press) and continuingly low interest rates for savers.

Clearly, proper planning for later life is more important today than ever before. We can see that as the increasing numbers of baby boomers retire, contrasting markedly with a decreasing working population with little job security, our society will come under increasing pressures as a result of an ageing population since we know that a large amount of government budget pays for the associated social care costs of looking after the aged. Also consider the impact of the recent global financial crisis on investment values to say nothing of the indebtedness of our governments, not only in paying back the debt, but actually meeting the interest payments of those debts.

The Daily Mail reported in early November that more than 20,000 pensioners in the UK were forced to sell their homes last year to pay for care fees and estimate that over the past five years, the cost of care fees have escalated by more than 20%.

The Association of British Insurers (ABI) states in a recent report “The costs involved can be daunting. The average cost of care in a residential home in the UK is approaching £25,000 a year. In a nursing home, if nursing care is also required, this cost rises to nearly £39,000 a year.  Even receiving long term care in your own home can be expensive. Every week around 300,000 households receive nearly four million hours of home help, and people in England spend an estimated £420 million a year on privately paid home care services.”

Seeking professional independent financial advice from a suitably qualified and experienced financial planner before you retire can put you in a much stronger financial position ahead of later life but if you’re already there, all is not lost and you should still seek advice from an adviser with a relevant Later Life qualifications who can provide specialist advice on areas such asImpaired life annuities, equity releases and immediate care plans.

The Sense Check at 60 concludes ‘To successfully manage funds in retirement people need to deal with 5 key risks: the risk of living too long; the corrosive impact of inflation; the need to maintain exposure to higher risk investments; the risk of withdrawing too much income and the prospect of requiring long term care later in life. The ‘baby boomer’ generation is reaching retirement. Millions of Britons will retire over the next 10 years. It is important they make informed decisions and plan their retirement well if they are to enjoy the benefits of the

longest retirement of any generation.’

A private consultation to discuss any issues arising from the above or matters of other financial concern may be arranged by contacting Sharon Sutton, Chartered Financial Planner, Thornton Associates Ltd; www.thorntonfs.com

Thornton Associates Limited is licensed by the Isle of Man Financial Supervision Commission.

They say time heals pain and so the financial crisis of 2008 seems more and more distant.  Markets have been in a buoyant mood and recently the FTSE 100 crossed the 6000 barrier, up some 8% year to date. The cost of government borrowing, as measured by the gilts market, continues to fall with 10 year gilts yielding a miserly 2.94 %, close to the year lows.

The new UK government has nailed its colours firmly to the mast of fiscal rectitude and has spelled out the deepest cuts in public spending for a generation.  The hope is that private investment will step in as the public purse steps out. 

There are precedents; remember the early Thatcher years were characterised by severe spending cuts leading to strong growth in the mid 1980s? The early Clinton presidency also paved the way for growth in the mid 1990s by bringing Federal deficits down.

Nevertheless, there are risks. Followers of Keynes would argue that, whilst the budget should balance in the medium term, too much fiscal contraction too soon risks taking demand out of the economy while it is still weak, pushing it back into recession.

The Bank of England, put on notice by the new Chancellor, will provide more monetary stimulus if the economy slows but the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) is divided on this issue with some arguing consistently for near-term interest rate rises with the prospect of rising inflation.

The pound has resumed its decline against other world currencies; clearly a weak pound remains a key plank in the UK recovery.  It is becoming evident that a Euro rate of 1.20 is just enough to provoke members of the MPC to go public in efforts to talk the pound down.  Whilst it makes our holidays more expensive, a weaker pound also makes our exports cheaper and raises overseas earnings in Sterling terms. 

Often overlooked is that of all major markets, the UK has the highest exposure to overseas earnings; optimism remains that UK international blue-chips are well placed.

Another reason to be optimistic is that valuations do continue to look good; results have generally been favourable, dividends are high and dividend growth is back on the agenda.  In fact many dividend yields are higher than their respective bond yields and underscores the fact that equity owners are being paid reasonably (compared to cash and bonds) whilst the economy gets back on its feet. This could be paving the way for some modest multiple expansion.

The “Euro” economy remains at risk from the very tight policy framework adopted by the ECB and the strength of the Euro is a significant headwind for the weaker Euro economies such as Ireland and Spain.

Elsewhere, in Emerging countries growth remains strong, although redirection of their priorities from export led growth to domestic consumption would likely help the rest of the world.  A strong indicator to watch out for would be an international agreement on global trade and a revaluation of the currencies belonging to the exporting nations; chief among these, China.

Clearly risks remain as does our view that the best way to insure assets against volatility is diversification through seeking advice from a licensed, reputable and well qualified adviser.

As Mark Twain said, ‘“History never repeats itself, at best it sometimes rhymes.”

Sharon Sutton is MD and Chartered Financial Planner at Thornton Associates Ltd who are licensed by the Financial Supervision Commission of the Isle of Man and Registered with the Insurance and Pensions Authority in respect of General Business

With investments there is always some sort of warning sign somewhere and knowing which are key, and which aren’t is problematic. Then you need to know actually when something dramatic might affect the markets. For example Greece was widely known about for ages before markets actually went south.

Given the extent to which markets have come off recently (FTSE down 15% over the past few weeks), looking at our client valuations you get a feel for how our portfolios operate in terms of care, judgement and the backbone that the level of diversification in the strategy brings to the overall result. so we are in pretty good shape and it certainly could be looking a lot worse. Damage has also been limited by a commitment to the US where dollar strength has offset underlying falls.

If you were to give us additional capital (and this also applies to new clients today) we would most likely be adding in more asset classes and more vehicles – each one playing a different role and bringing a different slant to the overall mix. but it is important to keep in mind that the equity weightings are controlled and we are just as focussed on ourdecision making in relation to equities as where we put the other funds to work in areas that should carry less volatility than equities.

We are of course concerned about the situation in the Eurozone and many threats to economic stability and a smooth recovery remain, but  are reasonably relaxed about equity market valuations and are placing stall on the continuing levels of improving corporate sector data coming through and Governments do deserve credit for their on-going judgement in finding appropriate solutions to problems that continue to emerge from what were unprecedented events and therefore their responses have had to be adaptable. Overall therefore, looking beyond short term concerns, there is the global economy’s recovery gathering pace, while headwinds from monetary tightening are still some way off for the developed economies so expect improvement in the values of growth assets.

Conditions are unsettled presently, but they have been for the past two years or so and we have come to learn that if you are managing a long term portfolio then you have to look through and ride through the periods of volatility whilst always keeping a close focus on whether the landscape has actually changed, but if it hasn’t then look to be opportunistic rather than panic because it is a fact of investment life that the best returns are made when it feels uncomfortable to be investing. If you are a long term investor and have a manager that understands your risk profile and objectives, then the actual short term risks can be managed and investments will be placed with the consideration that short term volatility may need to be absorbed.

posted by Sharon Sutton; sharon@thorntonfs.com

By Nicholas Paler | Citywire | 08:00:00 | 13 April 2010

The majority of solicitors and accountants believe they can increase their referrals to IFAs, research from JPMorgan Asset Management (JPMAM) has found.

More than 80% of the 198 accountancy and solicitor firms surveyed said there was ‘potential to increase their level of referrals’ to advisers.

A large proportion of firms regularly recommend clients to IFAs. A total of 43% of accountants and 36% of solicitors refer clients once a month, while a further 26% and 20% respectively do so once a quarter.

In total only 10% of accountants and 3% of solicitors currently referred clients to IFAs once a year or less.

The report also said advisers are at an advantage in setting up professional connections.

JPMAM estimated there are 22,000 registered IFAs, compared with 128,000 practising solicitors and 119,000 chartered accountants. ‘The two other advice professions outnumber IFAs at least four to one – a fact that should put IFAs at an advantage in the professional connections market,’ the report says.

Sifa managing director Ian Muirhead (pictured) agreed there was an opportunity for advisers to work more closely with solicitors in particular, thanks to the upcoming Legal Services Act which comes into force next year.

‘Solicitors’ business models are too reliant on transactions, and they will need to offer more services to clients going forward, so potentially there is tremendous demand there for IFAs,’ he said.

JPMAM said solicitors and accountants prioritised chartered and certified status above all else when looking for advisers to recommend, with 96% of accountants and 94% of solicitors citing it as the most important factor when evaluating an IFA.

JPMAM also found accountants and solicitors were not keen on setting up official businesses with IFAs, with only 5% of respondents looking to establish an internal IFA business or launch a joint venture with an IFA-firm.

They are also less concerned with how advisers are remunerated, with only 40% of respondents actively seeking out a fee-based IFA when recommending them.

Controversial tax law was fiercely resisted by IT contractors

Written by Dawinderpal Sahota

Computing, 06 Apr 2010

The Conservative Party announced last week that it plans to review the controversial IR35 tax legislation if it gets into power after the 6 May general election.

The IR35 legislation was introduced by the Labour government in 2000.

HM Revenue and Customs said that IR35 was introduced to prevent an individual avoiding tax on payments for services by providing those services through an intermediary.

Many self-employed IT contractors who were previously trading as ” independent companies” were particularly hard hit by IR35. As well as claiming they would no longer benefit from tax breaks on travel or training, many said they would have to quit IT contracting altogether and find more lucrative work.

The Conservatives claim that IR35 has cost business £73m over 10 years but has barely raised any revenue for the Treasury.

Shadow business minister Mark Prisk criticised Gordon Brown for making it harder to be self-employed at a time when Britain should be open for business.

“For the last 13 years, Labour have constantly meddled with the tax rules for freelancers and self-employed,” he said. “IR35 has especially proved to be over-complex, uncertain and often unfair.”

He said that a Conservative government would undertake a fundamental review of current arrangements with the aim of providing a “clearer, lasting and fairer tax regime”.